Page Title

Text Box: WHEN A PRIEST CHOOSES THE MOST HEINOUS OF EVIL IN PREFERENCE TO GOD! Roman Catholic Priest Father Rodney (Tony) Ricard has made it very clear he voted for Barack Obama for President because both he and Mr. Obama are Negroes. He also made it very clear he knows Mr. Obama intends to have as many babies killed through abortion and through the infanticide process of withholding medical assistance and any form of comfort from those babies who survive an attempted abortion. He also made it very clear he is aware of and knows the teaching of God and the Church (the teachings are the same) against abortion and infanticide, that he discarded the teaching of God in favor of his own desire to elect a Negro President of the United States of America. Ricard expressed his position, opinion, and advocation of rebellion against God, in a commentary column in the November 22, 2008, issue of the Clarion Herald, the official publication of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of New Orleans (Vol 47, No. 38, page 15). The Roman Catholic Archbishop of New Orleans, Alfred C. Hughes, is its Publisher and President. Issues of the Clarion Herald can be viewed at: http://www.clarionherald.org/november.html this issue can be viewed at: http://www.clarionherald.org/pdfs/2008/11_22_08/11_22_08.pdf and the article, covering more than half a page, can be viewed at: http://www.clarionherald.org/pdfs/2008/11_22_08/page15.pdf In his column Ricard makes reference to several Negro political and civic leaders, and Negro clerical leaders of the Roman Catholic Church, intimating the election of Mr. Obama now truly opens the door for all Negroes to attain true leadership roles in their respective areas for the first time in history. It is very interesting that Ricard totally ignores Saint Linus, who was actually

Text Box: the first Pope of Rome, and who was (is) a Negro. Perhaps the stellar example of faithful service to God and making God’s desires his own by Saint Linus would detract from Ricard’s position? Ricard knowingly and intentionally placed his personal materialistic and temporal desires in a position of predominance over and superior to God’s expressed desires and law. He then promulgated his deed. When a Priest openly defies the teachings of God and the Church, and his Bishop provides the medium by which this defiance is spread, as is the reality in this instance, neither the Priest nor the Bishop even begins to meet their most basic vows, their most fundamental of sacred promises, to God. When that defiance becomes open advocation of one of the most heinous of sins, the torture murder of the most defenseless of humans, an human in the womb, or a new born, the Divine reaction must be akin to a gut wrenching vomiting - perhaps of the individual(s) involved into the depths of Hell. The Divine reaction definitely is not one of happiness. In even having such opinions Ricard transgresses the foundations of the Priesthood, of service to God. In allowing, and not just allowing but providing access to widely disseminate his immoral position and opinion, and in not immediately, publicly chastising and condemning Ricard, Hughes has also transgressed the foundations of the Priesthood, of service to God, and has violated the core of his position of Bishop. Of Bishop, not As Bishop. What both Ricard and Hughes have done is not succumb to temptation. What they have done is defy God without remorse. This is not a matter of choosing between or amongst different goods, or even amongst different evils. It is Ricard and those of his ilk shouting: kill them babies as long as we get a black in office. It is Hughes and his ilk saying: look how politically correct I am.

Text Box: All of the True Faith are brothers to Christ. But a Priest is a special child of the Ever Virgin Mary and brother in blood to Christ. A Bishop stands in the place of Christ, for where the Bishop is, there is the Church. Christ made this very clear when from the cross He said to His mother and to Saint John, from the cross, “Woman, behold thy son . . . Behold thy mother.” (John 19:26-27) By such conduct and their promotion of such conduct Priests and Bishops such as these spit on the face of Christ as He hangs dying on the cross. They are covered in the Blood of the Lamb. But not with the Blood of Salvation. It is with the Blood of Guilt. The death thorough abortion or infanticide of every child whose death can in the least measure be attributed to Mr. Obama is fully attributed to Mr. Obama, and to those who voted for him, and to those who in any manner acquiesce to any measure of support for him, though their sins of commission, AND to every individual who did not support a viable alternative to Mr. Obama and thereby contributed to the election of Mr. Obama, through their sin of omission. When such sin of commission is by a Priest or a Bishop, the sinner has violated their blood bond with Christ. Christ said it were better for those who harm little children, to be cast into the sea with a millstone tied around their necks. Clearly, little children are harmed, they are killed, they are killed through torture, and every one of their tortured deaths can be placed in the hands of Mr. Obama and those who supported him, especially those who supported him because of the colour of his skin and who supported him despite his avowed intention to have as many babies killed by torture as is possible. The Germans who lived near the Nazi death camps were held responsible for each murder at the death camps because they did not oppose the murders. Likewise, those who do not oppose abortion are responsible for each abortion, for each torture murder of an as of then yet unborn child, as though they had committed the abortion themselves. Likewise as regards infanticide through neglect of abortion

Go to page