Page Title

Text Box: Revolution, fomented and lead by libertines, the enlightened, and the Bolshevik - Communist Russian Revolution, lead by enlightened libertine intellectuals, to realize just how blood thirsty libertines really are. One need but consider the fact that libertines support abortion on demand. That most of them support abortion at any time of the development of the baby, to realize just how blood thirsty libertines really are. One need but consider the fact that generally, libertines support euthanasia, physician assisted suicide, and generally, anything which will kill human beings, especially human beings other than themselves, and one will realize just how blood thirsty libertines really are. Consider the war activities of one of the best known American libertines of current times, former President William Clinton. Against which side did he focus United States armed forces in his war? He placed American armed forces against the Orthodox and Roman Catholic populations, and in support of the non-Christian side. Before launching cruise missiles at a location where Osama bin Laden was known to be, Clinton’s made sure the missiles were launched from a place where they would pass over several countries, and then had his State Department contact those countries to inform them of the launch and the target. This allowed officials of those countries to contact Osama bin Laden so he could escape. They did, and he did. On several occasions other countries had Osama bin Laden in custody and offered him to Clinton, who declined. Any action he took against Islamic terrorist was ineffectual, when it could have been very effective. Libertines oppose anything which even hints of being good. When there is conflict or war, libertines always, yes always, oppose the side which fights for good, even if it is to their own determent. Libertines also fail to mention their own

Text Box: use of certain political tactics, when those political tactics are used against them. During the five or six years prior to the 2006, American congressional elections, when the Republican party had control of the House and Senate, libertines blocked Senate consideration of all but a very few appointments to the federal courts. They blocked consideration by threatening to filibuster is an attempt were made to bring a vote on the appointments to the floor. To overcome a filibuster in the Senate, sixty Senators must vote to quash the filibuster. Having just over fifty votes, the Republicans could not overcome the filibuster threat, so the appointments went without being considered, and the country suffered by having a less effective federal court system. Newspapers and media journalists ignored this activity by the libertines. However, when the libertines took control of both house of congress in 2007, and Senate Republicans used the same filibuster threat tactic as the libertines, newspapers, media journalist, and PBS issued continual condemnations of the Republicans for even considering much less using the filibuster tactic. Libertines use every evil, maligning, slanderous tactic possible. Ridicule is one of their most used and most potent weapons. When a public figure is the focus of their attack, libertines attack the target’s intelligence, stating the target is stupid. They are unrelenting in their attacks, even when the facts and evidence show they are wrong, show they are lying, prove they are stating that which they know is not true. They do this because they are evil, wish to be evil, promote evil, and have found attacking their target’s intelligence by ridicule is a most effective attack. It is effective because libertines control the news, entertainment, and communications systems throughout the world, but especially in America and the Western European countries. They therefore can and do press their attacks, flooding the senses of the public with their propaganda until they have swayed public opinion to the point

Text Box: the general public believes their lies about the target of their attack. One must be very careful not to equate being a libertine with being a member of the Democrat party. There must be a few hundred thousand Democrats who do not hold political office and who are not libertines. Can anyone think of a Democrat who does hold a political office and who is not a libertine? Remember, such a person would have to be pro life and anti abortion with no reservation, totally against physician assisted suicide and totally against euthanasia, totally against same sex unions, totally against lesbians and homosexuals adopting children, totally in favor of supporting and actually work to support the traditional family in every manner possible, totally in favor of teaching universally accepted morality and moral values in school (which in our society means teaching Christian values without teaching Christianity - it can easily be done), favor teenagers abstaining from sex instead of teaching teenagers how to have sex without the girl becoming pregnant. Who, pray tell, is this Democrat, and where is he or she? +

Go to page